Policy Matters  |   October 2013
Applying Research to Practice: The Promise and Challenge of CER
Article Information
Advocacy and Legislative Issues / Quality Improvement / Policy Matters
Policy Matters   |   October 2013
Applying Research to Practice: The Promise and Challenge of CER
ASA Monitor 10 2013, Vol.77, 10-12.
ASA Monitor 10 2013, Vol.77, 10-12.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) has become one of the most important and recent developments in health services and health policy research. Briefly, CER can be thought of as research that seeks to improve the effectiveness, efficacy and efficiency of health care by “comparing alternative methods of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of care delivery.”1,2  Although researchers and governments in several European countries have used CER extensively since the 20th century, it was only in 2009 that policymakers and researchers in the United States placed increasing emphasis on this research approach. That year, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and, by extension, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act included more than $1.1 billion worth of funding for CER. The Affordable Care Act, passed the following year, established the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and, with it, set aside more than $3.5 billion of CER funding through 2019. These funding opportunities have generated multiple studies that physicians, other medical professionals, researchers and patient advocates can use to evaluate patient choice, treatment options and optimal patient care.
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title

This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×