Committees  |   February 2013
Expert Witness Testimony Review
Author Affiliations
  • Gregory K. Unruh, M.D.
    Committee on Expert Witness Testimony Review
Article Information
Ethics / Medicolegal Issues / Quality Improvement / Committees
Committees   |   February 2013
Expert Witness Testimony Review
ASA Monitor 02 2013, Vol.77, 36-38.
ASA Monitor 02 2013, Vol.77, 36-38.
I have the privilege of Chairing the ASA Committee on Expert Witness Testimony Review. Many members have commented to me that they do not know of the committee or its work, so I’ll try to provide a little insight into the committee’s history and its activities.
The ASA Committee on Professional Liability proposed revisions to the then-current Guidelines for Expert Witness Qualifications and Testimony to the ASA House of Delegates, which were adopted in 2003. The preamble of the guidelines (see and look for the Standards and Guidelines page under “Expert Witness”) reads:
“The integrity of the litigation process in the United States depends in part on the honest, unbiased, responsible testimony of expert witnesses. Such testimony serves to clarify and explain technical concepts and to articulate professional standards of care. The ASA supports the concept that such expert testimony by anesthesiologists should be readily available, objective and unbiased. To limit uninformed and possibly misleading testimony, experts should be qualified for their role and should follow a clear and consistent set of ethical guidelines.”
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title

This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×