Features  |   June 2017
Anesthesia Quality Institute Update: A Successful 2016 and Plans for 2017
Article Information
Practice Management / Advocacy and Legislative Issues / Quality Improvement / Features
Features   |   June 2017
Anesthesia Quality Institute Update: A Successful 2016 and Plans for 2017
ASA Monitor 06 2017, Vol.81, 18-20.
ASA Monitor 06 2017, Vol.81, 18-20.
Just how much did the Anesthesia Quality Institute (AQI) grow in 2016, and what does that growth mean for the AQI’s rapidly increasing number of participants?
The EPs who met the reporting requirements will avoid the 2 percent negative payment adjustment, applied in 2018. The remaining 4 percent potential Value-based Payment Modifier adjustment will be determined based upon how well EPs performed on their quality and cost measures compared to national benchmarks.
The remaining 3,908 EPs opted to report quality data via the Qualified Registry (QR). For 2016, the QR option was recommended for EPs who were able to report some measures but unable to meet the QCDR reporting requirements. ECs who were unable to report nine measures across three domains will undergo the CMS Measure-Applicability Validation (MAV) process later this year. CMS uses the MAV process to verify the EP submitted all applicable measures, and 2018 payment adjustments will be determined accordingly.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
0 Comments
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Name
Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title
Comment


This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×