Quality & Regulatory Affairs  |   May 2017
Quality Reporting: The Science of Constructing a Performance Measure
Article Information
Quality Improvement / Quality & Regulatory Affairs
Quality & Regulatory Affairs   |   May 2017
Quality Reporting: The Science of Constructing a Performance Measure
ASA Monitor 05 2017, Vol.81, 60-61.
ASA Monitor 05 2017, Vol.81, 60-61.
With the implementation of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), most physician anesthesiologists view quality measures as a means to satisfy reporting requirements for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). However, a well-designed quality measure has the dual potential to drive real improvements in patient care at the local level in addition to satisfying regulatory reporting requirements.
Physician anesthesiologists often report that existing quality measures pose a significant data collection burden without providing meaningful insight into the quality of care they provide. Many historic measures that were included in the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and are now part of the MIPS Quality Component are viewed as “check the box” measures that may not adequately reflect the diversity and nuances of anesthesia care.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
0 Comments
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Name
Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title
Comment


This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×