Committees  |   July 2016
Speaking the Same Language When Reporting Outcomes
Author Affiliations
  • Arnold J. Berry, M.D., M.P.H.
    Ad Hoc Committee on Data Definitions
    Chair
Article Information
Cardiovascular Anesthesia / Education / CPD / Pain Medicine / Practice Management / Quality Improvement / Committees
Committees   |   July 2016
Speaking the Same Language When Reporting Outcomes
ASA Monitor 07 2016, Vol.80, 50.
ASA Monitor 07 2016, Vol.80, 50.
Myocardial infarction, heart attack, acute MI, STEMI –are these all the same event? Maybe, maybe not, especially when we are talking about patient outcomes reported to a data warehouse such as the Anesthesia Quality Institute’s (AQI’s) National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry (NACOR). While one practice may call the adverse event a myocardial infarction and another refers to a similar occurrence as an acute MI, do the two practices utilize the same diagnostic criteria for making the diagnosis? Are ECG changes, troponin elevation and chest pain required? What troponin level is necessary?
Although this may sound like an academic exercise, it becomes critically important when an anesthesia practice wants or needs to compare its outcomes against national benchmarks, or the practice participates in a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) and must report their performance on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quality measures. Simply stated, without standardization of clinical terms and their definitions, the data will likely not be valid. Everyone must be speaking the same language.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
0 Comments
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Name
Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title
Comment


This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×