Articles  |   May 2016
SEE Question
Article Information
Cardiovascular Anesthesia / Education / CPD / Quality Improvement / Articles
Articles   |   May 2016
SEE Question
ASA Monitor 05 2016, Vol.80, 34-35.
ASA Monitor 05 2016, Vol.80, 34-35.
A recent study examined the durability over time of class I recommendations (“procedure/treatment should be performed/administered”) from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines. When class I recommendations in a past guideline were compared to the corresponding recommendation in the succeeding guideline, which of the following was most likely true?
Clinical practice guidelines are widespread in modern medical practice. Intermittent updating is important to ensure that the guidelines reflect current evidence from the literature. However, updating that occurs too frequently, especially if substantial changes are made, can reduce trust in the guideline process and undermine efforts to promote their use. Additionally, frequent changes increase the possibility that recommendations are made prematurely, prior to the accumulation of sufficient evidence to support their validity. Premature recommendations that are later determined to be inappropriate may not only lead to patient harm but also unnecessary health care costs.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
0 Comments
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Name
Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title
Comment


This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×