Features  |   December 2013
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring and the Anesthesiologist
Author Affiliations
  • Antoun Koht, M.D.
    Committee on Neuroanesthesia
Article Information
Technology / Equipment / Monitoring / Features
Features   |   December 2013
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring and the Anesthesiologist
ASA Monitor 12 2013, Vol.77, 14-16.
ASA Monitor 12 2013, Vol.77, 14-16.
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) using evoked potentials and electromyography has become commonplace during many surgical procedures. It is used to identify and map areas of the central nervous system or monitor for neurological insults. It is believed to improve intraoperative decision-making and reduce neurological risk. A recent evidence-based review by the American Academy of Neurology and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has reinforced its role during surgery on the spine.1  In particular, it can identify early neural dysfunction due to ischemia that could signal the need for improvement in blood flow and reduction of injury. Most anesthesiologists are now, with a varying degree, familiar with the need for a general anesthetic that is supportive of monitoring (e.g., reduced reliance on inhalational agents and neuromuscular blocking agents) with some of these monitoring techniques (especially motor evoked potentials). What anesthesiologists may not be familiar with is that the current monitoring process requires the active participation of the anesthesiologist beyond the choice and management of anesthetic agents.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
0 Comments
Submit a Comment
Submit A Comment

Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated.

Name
Affiliation & Institution
I have a potential conflict of interest
Comment Title
Comment


This feature is available to Subscribers Only
ASA Member Login or Create an Account ×